Underreported News

2011

The following is a collection of just a few of the underreported news stories of the last year or so. I think when you look over the entries here, you'll be surprised at what the traditional media overlooks. On to our examples...

Manipulation of Social Media

Software is being developed for the US Military, to let it manipulate social media sites. The plan is to use fake personas to influence conversations and to spread propaganda favorable to the United States. As reported in a Guardian article;

A Californian corporation has been awarded a contract with United States Central Command (Centcom), which oversees US armed operations in the Middle East and Central Asia, to develop what is described as an "online persona management service" that will allow one US serviceman or woman to control up to 10 separate identities based all over the world.

Simply "adding" information under false pretenses may not sound too nefarious, but Centcom will also be able to hide opinions they don't like, by crowding them out. They will be able to create a false consensus on matters as well. Centcom spokesman Commander Bill Speaks said it would be illegal to address US audiences, so the plan will target only residents of other countries. The article added that;

Once developed, the software could allow US service personnel, working around the clock in one location, to respond to emerging online conversations with any number of co-ordinated messages, blogposts, chatroom posts and other interventions. Details of the contract suggest this location would be MacDill air force base near Tampa, Florida, home of US Special Operations Command.

Assassination Program

Has the Obama administration put an assassination program in place? Do the target include US citizens? The answer to both questions appears to be yes, according to a report on the website Projectcensored.org;

Court documents, evidence offered by Human Rights Watch and a special United Nations report allege that U.S citizens suspected of encouraging “terror” had been put on “death lists.” Reports of the ‘death’ list’ say Obama’s Director of National Intelligence told a Congressional hearing that the program was within the rights of the Executive Branch of the government and did not need to be revealed. At least two people are known to have been murdered by Central Intelligence Agency operatives under the program.

Though the program has been challenged, a New York City court judge refused to rule on the matter.

Private Prisons Fund Immigration Legislation

Though voters elect lawmakers, laws are often crafted to fit the needs of companies which fund political campaigns and through lobbyists who court legislators. So what would private prison companies want in terms of legislation? We, it certainly helps them if more people are put in their prisons, and that seems to be the aim of their support for certain laws that target illegal immigrants. As reported by Projectcensored.org;

Arizona’s Governor Jan Brewer received substantial campaign financing from Corrections Corporation of America (CCA) and GEO Group which are the nation’s two largest companies that design, build, finance and operate prisons. CCA, based in Nashville, Tennessee, and Geo Group, a global corporation based in Boca Raton, Florida, are the principal moving forces in the behind-the-scenes organization of the current wave of anti-immigrant legislative efforts.

Keep in mind that these companies and others like them rely almost entirely on government money--tax dollars. The incarceration of illegal immigrants caught by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) is a large source of revenue. The article notes that;

Brewer employs two former CCA lobbyists as aides that assisted signing SB 1070 into law on April 23rd. CCA, which already has several detention facilities in Arizona and is hoping to expand its immigrant business in that state, is expected to show a huge increase in revenues when SB 1070 is implemented.

Whatever your opinions about how illegal immigrants should be handled, it seems problematic to have legislation being influenced by large companies that stand to make big money from only one type of solution. Consider, for example, that extending the period of incarceration is in the interest of these companies, even though this costs taxpayers much more than faster deportation would.

Copyright - Terms / Privacy / Contact


Was this page interesting or useful? Please let others know with one of these...